Saturday, 28th September 2024

toto119.xyz

Just another WordPress site

signle blog post

Standard

A Busan KCC official defended his player Heo Woong. This is the first time since the controversy over privacy.

Uncategorized 30 Comments

In an interview with the Sunday Newspaper released on the 8th, a Busan KCC official said, “There are speculative articles about Heo Woong, but it is difficult to tell you in detail because it is a case under investigation,” adding, “From the evidence identified, I think Heo Woong is a victim.”

He added, “There has been no discussion of disciplinary procedures.” 메이저사이트

In addition, unlike the externally known image of a “model student,” the official denied controversy over fan service and unfaithful attitude within the club. Heo Woong has not had a good reputation in the basketball world so far, and club officials have also been known to the media as “a player who was not easy to manage.”

The official said, “I don’t know about anything else, but the club has never acted to make such a story come out. Heo Woong has good relationship with club officials and has never had a conflict with them enough to meet and talk with the general manager and manager in private several times even during the offseason.”

It is the first time that a KCC official has expressed his position through a direct interview since the controversy over Heo Woong’s private life. As the club identified Heo Woong as a “victim,” some online communities are criticizing him.

Heo Woong’s ex-lover A appointed a legal representative and is currently spreading to a battle of truth.

Heo Woong recently appeared on a YouTube channel and mentioned the controversy over his private life. “There was a suspicion that the second pregnancy might not be my child, but I thought it was my child because I’m a public figure and I think I have something to take responsibility for, so I tried to do my best,” he said.

As for the act of breaking into her house and scribbling, she said, “As soon as we broke up, she had another man. We wanted to meet again,” and added, “We knew each other’s passwords at home. We missed each other so much that we wrote a letter. We didn’t put a threatening message in it.”

When Heo Woong claimed that A was a worker at an entertainment establishment, A also refuted the claim.

“The most important issue at the moment is whether the girlfriend’s multiple expressions, who is about to have two abortions, constitutes blackmail,” said lawyer Noh Jong-eon, A’s legal representative. “Nevertheless, Heo Woong found suspicions that the data was fabricated following the second assault on privacy that was not related to the essence.”

He also said, “We will file a complaint against an informant who changes his words maliciously and spreads false information for defamation of false information.”

30 comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *